首页> 外文OA文献 >Is biotechnology (more) acceptable when it enables a reduction in phytosanitary treatments? A European comparison of the acceptability of transgenesis and cisgenesis
【2h】

Is biotechnology (more) acceptable when it enables a reduction in phytosanitary treatments? A European comparison of the acceptability of transgenesis and cisgenesis

机译:生物技术(可以减少植物检疫处理)是否可以接受?欧洲对转基因和顺遗传的可接受性比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Reduced pesticide use is one of the reasons given by Europeans for accepting new genetic engineering techniques. According to the advocates of these techniques, consumers are likely to embrace the application of cisgenesis to apple trees. In order to verify the acceptability of these techniques, we estimate a Bayesian multilevel structural equation model, which takes into account the multidimensional nature of acceptability and individual, national, and European effects, using data from the Eurobarometer 2010 73.1 on science. The results underline the persistence of clear differences between European countries and whilst showing considerable defiance, a relatively wider acceptability of vertical gene transfer as a means of reducing phytosanitary treatments, compared to horizontal transfer.
机译:减少农药使用是欧洲人接受新的基因工程技术的原因之一。根据这些技术的倡导者,消费者很可能会接受同基因发生法在苹果树上的应用。为了验证这些技术的可接受性,我们使用来自欧洲晴雨表2010 73.1的数据,估计了一个贝叶斯多级结构方程模型,该模型考虑了可接受性以及个人,国家和欧洲影响的多维性质。结果表明,欧洲国家之间仍然存在明显的分歧,尽管表现出很大的反抗,但与水平转移相比,垂直基因转移作为减少植物检疫处理手段的接受度相对较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号